Mh. Jones et al., THE MILDLY ABNORMAL CERVICAL SMEAR - PATIENT ANXIETY AND CHOICE OF MANAGEMENT, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 89(5), 1996, pp. 257-260
Argument continues over the best management of women with a first mild
ly dyskaryotic cervical smear: should they be referred for prompt colp
oscopy, or should they be kept under cytological review, with recourse
to colposcopy if the abnormality persists? One consideration is the a
mount pf anxiety generated. We measured anxiety, retrospectively, in t
wo groups of women who had been managed by one or other method. Colpos
copy caused more anxiety than cytological surveiliance. When told that
their smear was mildly abnormal, 47% of the immediate-colposcopy grou
p (n=182), compared with 33% of the surveillance group (n=163), though
t they had cancer,none the less, there was a general preference for im
mediate colposcopy. Whatever the relative merits of these two strategi
es for clinical management, it is clear that both forms of screening,
and especially colposcopy, demand better information for patients.