THE 2,2'-BIPYRIDYL-6-CARBOTHIOAMIDE COPPER(II) COMPLEX DIFFERS FROM THE IRON(II) COMPLEX IN ITS BIOCHEMICAL EFFECTS IN TUMOR-CELLS, SUGGESTING POSSIBLE DIFFERENCES IN THE MECHANISM LEADING TO CYTOTOXICITY
G. Nocentini et A. Barzi, THE 2,2'-BIPYRIDYL-6-CARBOTHIOAMIDE COPPER(II) COMPLEX DIFFERS FROM THE IRON(II) COMPLEX IN ITS BIOCHEMICAL EFFECTS IN TUMOR-CELLS, SUGGESTING POSSIBLE DIFFERENCES IN THE MECHANISM LEADING TO CYTOTOXICITY, Biochemical pharmacology, 52(1), 1996, pp. 65-71
2,2'-bipyridyl-6-carbothioamide (BPYTA) is an antitumor agent with che
lating properties. It has previously been shown that the R2 subunit of
ribonucleotide reductase (RR) is its major cellular target, but RR in
hibition is observed only in the presence of ferrous iron (BPYTA-Fe, m
olar ratio 2:1). Because the copper (II) complex of BPYTA (BPYTA-Cu, m
olar ratio 1:1)) has in vitro antitumor activity comparable to that of
BPYTA-Fe, we studied the mechanism of action of this new metal comple
x. Spectorphotometric and HPLC studies demonstrated that, at pH 7.5, B
PYTA Cu is stable at molar ratio 2:1 and copper is in its favored oxid
ized form [BPYTA Cu(II)]. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studie
s with mouse recombinant R2 demonstrated that BPYTA-Cu destroys the R2
tyrosyl radical at the same concentration at which BPYTA-Fe does (78%
vs 73% destruction at 200 mu M, With 5 min of contact), but R2 inhibi
tion is not time-dependent. Studies of the metabolism of [C-14] cytidi
ne suggest that the cytotoxic activity of BPYTA-Cu can be explained in
terms of RR inhibition. However, the significant inhibition of RNA sy
nthesis and the lack of cross-resistance to BPYTA-Cu of cell lines res
istant to other RR inhibitors suggest that BPYTA-Cu may have more than
one cellular target. Moreover, cell proliferation studies suggest tha
t, unlike BPYTA-Fe, BPYTA-Cu displays its activity immediately after c
ontact with the target cells. Our study demonstrates that significant
differences in the biochemical effects of BPYTA and, perhaps, also its
mechanism of action are due solely to the bonded transition metalloel
ement. This might also be the case with other chelators that demonstra
te cytotoxic activity following metalloelement chelation.