The two-dimensional spatial analysis procedure based on separable ARIM
A processes, proposed by Cullis and Gleeson (1991 Biometrics 47, 1449-
1460), is used to analyze 35 cereal yield trials with incomplete block
designs. Models with different large-scale variation components and d
iverse small-scale variation processes, modeled as one-dimensional and
two-dimensional (separable) ARIMA processes, were compared. Nineteen
spatial models were considered and two criteria were used to assess sp
atial model adequacy: (a) the average standard error of the pairwise v
ariety differences (SED) and (b) the mean squared error of prediction
(MSE) based on a cross-validation approach. Spatial analysis is more e
fficient in reducing residual variation than incomplete block analysis
. Although there was no one model that best fit all the trials, the tw
o-dimensional first-order autoregressive model was the most efficient
in terms of the SED and MSE criteria (in 21 and 14 trials, respectivel
y).