MEIC EVALUATION OF ACUTE SYSTEMIC TOXICITY .2. IN-VITRO RESULTS FROM 68 TOXICITY ASSAYS USED TO TEST THE FIRST 30 REFERENCE CHEMICALS AND ACOMPARATIVE CYTOTOXICITY ANALYSIS
C. Clemedson et al., MEIC EVALUATION OF ACUTE SYSTEMIC TOXICITY .2. IN-VITRO RESULTS FROM 68 TOXICITY ASSAYS USED TO TEST THE FIRST 30 REFERENCE CHEMICALS AND ACOMPARATIVE CYTOTOXICITY ANALYSIS, ATLA. Alternatives to laboratory animals, 24, 1996, pp. 273-311
Results from tests of the first 30 MEIC reference chemicals in 68 diff
erent toxicity assays are presented as a prerequisite to subsequent in
vitro/in vivo comparisons of acute toxicity data. A comparative cytot
oxicity study was also carried out. Firstly, the variability of all of
the results was analysed by using principal components analysis (PCA)
, analyses of variance (ANOVAs) and pairwise comparisons of means acco
rding to Tukey's method. The first PCA component described 80% of the
variance of all of the cytotoxicity data. Tukey's ANOVA indicated a si
milar sensitivity for the assays, of approximately 80%. Secondly, the
influence of five major methodological components on the general varia
bility of the results was evaluated by linear regression and ANOVA lin
ear contrast analyses. The findings were that: a) the toxicity of many
chemicals increased with exposure time; b) in general, human cytotoxi
city was predicted well by animal cytotoxicity tests; c) this predicti
on was poor for two chemicals; d) the prediction of human cytotoxicity
by the ecotoxicological tests was only fairly good; e) one organotypi
c endpoint used, i.e. contractility of muscle cells, gave different re
sults to those obtained according to viability/growth toxicity criteri
a; f) twelve comparisons of similar test systems involving different c
ell types (including highly differentiated cells) showed similar toxic
ities regardless of cell type; and g) nine out of ten comparisons of t
est systems with identical cell types and exposure times revealed simi
lar toxicities, regardless of the viability or growth endpoint measure
ment used. Factors b, f and g must be the main causes of the remarkabl
e similarity between the total results, while factors a, c, d and e, t
ogether with other minor factors that were not analysed, contributed t
o the 20% dissimilarity. The findings strongly support the basal cytot
oxicity concept, and will facilitate future in vitro toxicity testing.