Dm. Willis et al., COMPARISON BETWEEN ORIENTAL AND OCCIDENTAL SUNSPOT OBSERVATIONS, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 37(2), 1996, pp. 189-229
The reliability of sunspot sightings recorded in various Oriental hist
ories is assessed by comparing carefully the Oriental sunspot sighting
s from 1862 onwards with contemporaneous Occidental white-light images
of the Sun acquired by the Royal Greenwich Observatory (RGO). As a pr
erequisite to this comparison, a simple procedure is developed for pro
ducing 'approximate reconstructions' of the white-light photographs of
the Sun obtained by the RGO during the interval 1874 May 09-1976 Dece
mber 31. The approximate reconstructions are based on precise measurem
ents of the positions and areas of sunspots on the solar photographs,
which have been published in tabulated form as the Greenwich Photoheli
ographic Results: 1873-1976. This reconstruction procedure is extremel
y important for the photoheliographic observations in the interval 187
4-1917, because the number of days for which approximate solar images
can be reconstructed significantly exceeds the number of days for whic
h contact prints of the original observations are available. The recon
structed solar images constitute a valuable homogeneous series of 'obs
ervations' that illustrates long-term Variations in sunspot activity.
Both reconstructed solar images and original contact prints are used t
o confirm that the dates of the Oriental sunspot sightings quoted in t
he various histories are largely correct. Therefore, these dates can b
e used with some confidence in statistical studies which are not obvio
usly invalidated by the sparseness of the Oriental sunspot sightings.