Objective: Numerous studies have demonstrated that alcohol outcome exp
ectancies are strong correlates of various aspects of alcohol use. How
ever, it has been suggested that forced-choice alcohol expectancy item
s may not measure the most salient anticipated effects of alcohol for
an individual, and thus may create superficial responses. Additionally
, research on attitude-behavior consistency has demonstrated that the
nature of how an attitude is elicited can lead to attitudes that are m
ore or less cognitive. The present study examined the applicability of
this aspect of attitude theory to the study of alcohol outcome expect
ancies and the utility of self-generated outcome expectancies and subj
ective evaluations in predicting alcohol use and problems. Method: In
an extension of methodology previously used in attitude research, alco
hol-using college students (N = 165, 87 female) generated alcohol expe
ctancies in response to two sentence stems designed to elicit ''affect
ively'' and ''cognitively'' based alcohol expectancies and made subjec
tive evaluations (SE) ratings of each item generated on dimensions of
positivity, likelihood and immediacy. Results: While no support was fo
und for the generalizability of a particular aspect of attitude theory
, several interesting findings emerged. SE ratings were significantly
related to measures of alcohol use and problems and, for alcohol use m
easures, predicted comparably to a standardized measure of expectancie
s. For alcohol dependence symptoms, the number of expectancies generat
ed predicted significant unique variance over that accounted for by su
bjective evaluations. Conclusions: These results indicate that the she
er number of alcohol expectancies accessible to an individual may be a
n important correlate of alcohol dependence, independent of subjective
evaluations.