A. Elkowitz et al., VARIOUS METHODS OF BREAST RECONSTRUCTION AFTER MASTECTOMY - AN ECONOMIC COMPARISON, Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 92(1), 1993, pp. 77-83
This study is an economic comparison of various methods of breast reco
nstruction after mastectomy. The hospital bills of 287 patients underg
oing breast reconstruction at three institutions from June of 1988 to
March of 1991 were analyzed. The procedures examined included mastecto
my, implant and tissue-expander reconstruction, and TRAM and latissimu
s pedicle flaps, as well as free TRAM and free gluteal flaps. These pr
ocedures were subdivided into those which were performed at the time o
f mastectomy and those performed at a later admission. In addition, au
xiliary procedures (i.e., revision, nipple reconstruction, tissue-expa
nder exchange, and contralateral mastopexy/reduction) also were examin
ed. Where appropriate, these procedures were subdivided into those per
formed under general or local anesthesia and by inpatient or outpatien
t status. Data from the three institutions were converted to N.Y.U. Me
dical Center costs for standardization. A table is presented that summ
arizes the costs of each individual procedure with all the pertinent v
ariations. In addition, a unique and novel method of analyzing the dat
a was developed. This paper describes a menu system whereby other data
regarding morbidity, mortality, and revision rates may be superimpose
d. With this information, the final cost of reconstruction can be extr
apolated and the various methods of reconstruction can be compared. Th
is method can be applied to almost any complex series of multiple proc
edures. The most salient points elucidated by this study are as follow
s: The savings generated by performing immediate reconstruction varies
between $5092 (p < 0.05) for free gluteal flaps and $10,616 (p < 0.05
) for pedicled TRAM flaps. Depending on specific procedure, outpatient
surgery offers an approximate $5000 savings as compared with the same
procedure performed on an inpatient basis. Lastly, we point out numer
ous economic inefficiencies in an effort to lower the financial cost o
f the surgical treatment of breast cancer and the subsequent reconstru
ction. Among our suggestions are to perform immediate reconstruction w
hen medically feasible and acceptable for the patient, to perform outp
atient procedures when possible, and to perform multiple procedures wh
en technically feasible.