Pc. Iwen et al., REVISED APPROACH FOR IDENTIFICATION AND DETECTION OF AMPICILLIN AND VANCOMYCIN RESISTANCE IN ENTEROCOCCUS SPECIES BY USING MICROSCAN PANELS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 34(7), 1996, pp. 1779-1783
The frequency of antimicrobial agent-resistant enterococci is increasi
ng, making accurate identification and screening for susceptibility es
sential, We evaluated the ability of MicroScan Positive Breakpoint Com
bo Type 6 panels (Dade MicroScan Inc., West Sacramento, Calif,) to ide
ntify Enterococcus species and to detect ampicillin and vancomycin res
istance, A total of 398 well-characterized Enterococcus isolates from
two institutions were inoculated into MicroScan panels, into conventio
nal biochemical assays, and into ampicillin and vancomycin agar diluti
on media, Resistance was verified by the broth macrodilution method, M
icroScan panels accurately detected resistance to ampicillin in 132 of
132 enterococcal isolates, while three isolates for which the MICs we
re <16 mu g/ml were classified incorrectly by MicroScan panels as resi
stant, No beta-lactamase-producing enterococci were detected. All 64 i
solates shelving resistance to vancomycin (MICs greater than or equal
to 32 mu g/ml) were correctly classified by MicroScan panels, Seven is
olates for which the vancomycin MICs were 8 and 16 mu g/ml were incorr
ectly classified as susceptible by MicroScan panels, while eight isola
tes for which the MICs were 4 mu g/ml were incorrectly labeled as inte
rmediate, Fourteen of these 15 isolates were subsequently identified a
s motile enterococci. Overall, there were three major errors in suscep
tibility testing for ampicillin and 15 minor errors for vancomycin, Co
nventional testing confirmed the identity of 181 Enterococcus faecalis
isolates, 157 E. faecium isolates, and 60 isolates of other species;
however, 56 of these 60 isolates were misidentified by the MicroScan p
anels, After recognition of this problem, a reviased approach which in
cluded tests for pigment, motility, and sucrose fermentation was devis
ed, In combination with these additional assays, the conventional Micr
oScan panels accurately identified the 56 originally misidentified iso
lates, In summary, the ability of MicroScan panels to detect vancomyci
n and ampicillin resistance in enterococci was confirmed, Our study fo
und that the inability of MicroScan panels to identify enterococci oth
er than E. faecalis and E. faecium can be compensated for by the addit
ion of standard assays.