H. Sari et al., EVALUATION OF SACROILIAC JOINTS IN ANKYLOSING-SPONDYLITIS BY CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY, COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND QUANTITATIVE SCINTIGRAPHY, Medical science research, 24(6), 1996, pp. 411-413
Sacroiliac joints of 30 patients clinically diagnosed as ankylosing sp
ondylitis were investigated by suprapubic sacroiliac radiography (SRR)
, sacroiliac computed tomography (SCT) and quantitative sacroiliac sci
ntigraphy (QSS) and these methods were compared. In the case of diagno
sing definite sacroiliitis, SSR was positive in 23 patients (76.6%), S
CT in 25 patients (83.3%) and QSS in 17 patients (56.6%). Although the
re was no significant difference between SSR and SCT in the case of gr
ading sacroiliitis, the number of normal patients was 7 with SSR and 3
with SCT. When grading was done by taking CT as standard, mean SI ind
ex values with QSS were in the normal range in grades 0, 1 and 4. In g
rades 2 and 3, SI index values showed sacroiliitis as compared with gr
ade 4. Therefore, if plain radiography is normal or doubtful in patien
ts clinically fitting ankylosing spondylitis, computed tomography must
be the choice of investigation. On the other hand, QSS is effective i
n showing activation of inflammation quantitatively instead of diagnos
ing sacroiliitis. Thus it is useful in following physiopathological ch
anges.