There has been considerable discussion in both the scientific literatu
re and general media concerning the appropriateness of the body shape
and proportions of the Ken and Barbie dolts, the most popular dolls in
modem history. The greatest concern has been of the possible influenc
e that these, and other ''cultural ideals'' for body shape, may have o
n young children. However, these concerns have been based entirely on
the subjective interpretation of how one perceives the body dimensions
of the dolls relative to an adult size. We therefore used our skills
in anthropometry and the rules of allometry to scale the dolls to an a
dult height to determine the dimensions that these dolls would assume
at this adjusted size. These were compared to actual proportions of se
veral representative adult groups of predominantly Anglo-Australian ma
les and females. The critics have been justified in their opinions sin
ce both Barbie and Ken are thin relative to the reference samples. Bar
bie's mean girth z-score relative to a reference cross-section of the
young adult population was -4.2. This indicates that the probability f
or such a body shape is less than 1 in 100,000. Ken is more realistic
at about 1 in 50.