Objective: To test the diagnostic validity of clinical algorithms for
the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in an urban population of marri
ed women in Turkey. Design: Cross-sectional population-based survey. S
ubjects: A systematic sample of 867 women who reported the use of cont
raceptive methods. Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity and
positive predictive value of clinical algorithms for the diagnosis of
C trachomatis. Results: C trachomatis was diagnosed in 4.89% of the w
omen. The WHO algorithm for use in settings where no vaginal examinati
on could be performed had a sensitivity of 9% and a specificity of 96%
. The corresponding figures for the WHO algorithm incorporating the fi
ndings of a speculum examination were 47% and 56% respectively. Algori
thms incorporating symptoms or signs other than those suggested by the
WHO did not yield satisfactory standards of validity. Conclusions: Th
e findings of this study do not support the widespread introduction of
the use of clinical decision models for screening of women for chlamy
dia infection in primary health care settings such as family planning
or antenatal clinics. The large number of false positive results with
the use of the clinical algorithms tested in this study would cause un
necessary costs to the health system and unnecessary interventions to
the women treated.