Vk. Arora et Pr. Gajri, PERFORMANCE OF SIMPLIFIED WATER-BALANCE MODELS UNDER MAIZE IN A SEMIARID SUBTROPICAL ENVIRONMENT, Agricultural water management, 31(1-2), 1996, pp. 51-64
Performance of the soil-plant-atmosphere-water (SPAW) model and water
balance model (WBM) was assessed in simulating water balance component
s under maize. The two models differed in their structure and input da
ta requirements. A few modifications involving the estimation of green
canopy based on the SPAW model procedures were used in a modified WBM
and its performance was also tested. Simulated sum of interception ev
aporation, soil evaporation, plant transpiration and deep drainage fro
m seeding to harvest with the WBM, modified WBM, and SPAW model matche
d well with the measured sum of profile water depletion, rain and irri
gation. The rms of deviations of the simulated sum were 3, 4 and 3 cm
for measured values ranging between 42 and 123 cm. Estimates of draina
ge with the WBM and modified WBM using empirical coefficients agreed w
ell with those calculated using the SPAW model. These results suggest
that drainage at water contents below field capacity needs to be inclu
ded in water balance studies. Soil evaporation was overestimated with
the three models, more so with the SPAW model, as indicated by compari
son with measured values from column studies. The slope of the relatio
n between above-ground biomass measured at harvest and estimated trans
piration with the three models (transpiration efficiency) varied betwe
en 0.44 and 0.51 t ha(-1) cm(-1). It suggests that the performance of
the modified WBM and SPAW model was comparable to the WBM which requir
es measured values of leaf area index to infer green canopy. Thus, the
modified WBM and SPAW model, which have a mechanism for estimating gr
een canopy, are more useful in assessing water balance components in c
ropped soils.