Ra. Davidson et al., EMOTIONAL AROUSAL IN TEMPORAL LOBECTOMY - AUTONOMIC AND PERFORMANCE EFFECTS OF SUCCESS AND FAILURE FEEDBACK, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section A, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 18(2), 1996, pp. 249-258
Both theory and evidence suggest that right temporal lobectomy (RTL) p
atients show hypoarousal and left temporal lobectomy (LTL) patients sh
ow relative hyperarousal (Davidson, Fedio, Smith, Aurielle, & Martin,
1992). However, we hypothesized that these differences occur only unde
r passive, nonevaluative stimulus conditions. The present study employ
ed, instead, conditions of performance evaluation. We recorded the ski
n conductance responses (SCRs) and reaction times (RTs) of RTLs, LTLs,
and normal controls (NCs) during easy and difficult trial blocks on a
target-detection task, with auditory success/failure feedback. We fou
nd that LTLs exhibited relative hypoarousal and retarded RTs and that
RTLs were normally aroused following success feedback. These results d
emonstrated that the arousal level of LTLs is contingent on stimulus c
onditions, thus calling into question the theory that this group is ge
nerally subject to hyperarousal. The two-dimensional theory of the neu
ral processing of emotional experience partially explains our data.