The similarities and differences between conceptual rainfall-runoff mo
dels developed by hydrologists and land-surface parameterisation schem
es developed for incorporation into atmospheric general circulation mo
dels (AGCMs) are explored. The simulations indicate that the key surfa
ce water and energy quantities estimated by a typical rainfall-runoff
model (MODHYDROLOG) and a typical land-surface scheme (BEST) for a wet
tropical catchment and a temperate ephemeral catchment are reasonably
similar. The results suggest that the parameterisations used in land-
surface schemes can simulate runoff satisfactorily for wet areas but a
re too simplified to model runoff adequately in ephemeral catchments.
The simulations also suggest that the simple algorithms used in rainfa
ll-runoff models can be adopted for climate change impact studies and
for use with AGCMs.