Previous studies comparing amputation and a limb-salvage procedure as
treatments for bone tumors described no differences between the two tr
eatments regarding the incidence of psychopathology or quality-of-life
outcomes. These studies were limited by the absence of standardized m
easures of psychopathology, by samples that included an overly broad a
ge range, or by including patients who had either upper- or lower-limb
bone cancers. A sample of 45 patients (43 with lower-limb osteosarcom
a and 2 with Ewing's sarcoma) who were aged 11-24 years at diagnosis a
nd had survived an average of seven years at the time of the study wer
e evaluated using both standardized measures of psychological symptoms
and a semistructured clinical interview. No differences were found in
the mean psychopathology scores of the two treatment groups (32 treat
ed with a limb salvage procedure and 13 with initial amputation). Sign
ificant differences in psychosocial adaptation were found between the
two groups. The amputees felt they were not employed at a level approp
riate to their skills and training, and they were less likely than the
limb salvage group to have married since the diagnosis. They also fel
t they had been subjected to greater job and social discrimination. Fu
rthermore, good coping skills protected the limb-spared group, but not
the amputees, from having higher scores on the measures of psychopath
ology, depression, and anxiety. The greater distress and the more comp
romised social and work satisfaction among the amputees warrants furth
er study. The authors suggest different directions for psychosocial in
terventions for the two groups.