S. Kadanali et al., PELVIC AND PERIAORTIC PERITONEAL CLOSURE OR NON-CLOSURE AT LYMPHADENECTOMY IN OVARIAN-CANCER - EFFECTS ON MORBIDITY AND ADHESION FORMATION, European journal of surgical oncology, 22(3), 1996, pp. 282-285
The effects of pelvic and periaortic peritoneal closure or (non-closur
e) on morbidity and adhesion formation were prospectively compared in
102 patients with ovarian cancer who had undergone a pelvic and periao
rtic lymphadenectomy. Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingoophorectomy,
bilateral pelvic and periaortic lymphadenectomy, omentectomy, appende
ctomy and lysis of pelvic adhesions for the standardization of initial
adhesion scores was performed on all patients. The pelvic and periaor
tic peritoneum were re-approximated in group I (n=50) patients, and le
ft open in group II (n=52) patients. The groups were similar for mean
age, previous surgery, tumour histology and disease stage, Morbidity c
haracteristics such as blood loss, transfusion rate, post-operative in
fectious and non-infectious complications, and total hospital stay wer
e also similar. After six courses of PAC (cisplatin 50 mg/m(2), Adriam
ycin 50 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2)) chemotherapy, all patie
nts underwent a second-look laparotomy. Persistent cancer was detected
in 49 of 102 (48.03%) patients. Adhesion scores were detected at the
time of second-look laparotomy. Adhesion scores for group I (8.9+/-2.9
) were significantly higher than the group II (peritoneum non-closure)
(5.8+/-2.3) (P<0.01). Closing the pelvic and periaortic peritoneum di
d not effect morbidity, but leaving the pelvic and periaortic peritone
um open significantly decreased the adhesion formation.