A STOCHASTIC APPROACH TO SIMULATE WATER-FLOW IN A MACROPOROUS SOIL

Citation
D. Mallants et al., A STOCHASTIC APPROACH TO SIMULATE WATER-FLOW IN A MACROPOROUS SOIL, Geoderma, 70(2-4), 1996, pp. 299-324
Citations number
51
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Soil Science
Journal title
ISSN journal
00167061
Volume
70
Issue
2-4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
299 - 324
Database
ISI
SICI code
0016-7061(1996)70:2-4<299:ASATSW>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Based on a stochastic approach, drainage in a layered soil profile wit h macropores was predicted using a one-dimensional numerical flow mode l. Soil hydraulic functions, theta(psi) and K(psi), were obtained from laboratory measurements on undisturbed 100 cm(3) soil cores. The core s were collected in 60 different locations for each of three soil hori zons along a 31 m transect on a sandy loam soil. The effect of a stoch astic description of theta(psi) and K(psi) on predicted fluxes and wat er content profiles was evaluated with the aid of Monte-Carlo simulati ons. Initially simulations were carried out with the actual field data . Alternatively, 500 sets of the multi-normal parameter vector P = {th eta(s), alpha, n, K-s} were generated and used in a Monte-Carlo simula tion approach. In addition, deterministic calculations were carried ou t using (1) arithmetic mean values of untransformed hydraulic paramete rs, (2) arithmetic mean values obtained after backtransformation of Ga ussian distributed parameters, and (3) alternatively using a set of me an bimodal retention and conductivity curves. Predictions obtained wit h the two stochastic methods and the deterministic cases are compared with measured cumulative outflow and moisture content profiles from fi fteen 1 m long undisturbed soil columns collected along the same trans ect. All simulations based on unimodal hydraulic functions underestima ted the mean observed drainage. If actual field data are used, the mea n outflow is 74% of the mean measured cumulative outflow, compared to 70% for the Monte-Carlo simulation. The range mean +/- two standard de viations of the simulated outflow for both methods is considerably sma ller compared to the measured range of variation. Deterministic predic tions of the total drainage amounted to 83, 83, and 127% of the observ ed drainage for the cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Observed outflow curves displaying macropore flow could not be predicted with the unimo dal Richards' flow equation. The results indicate that the field-scale unsaturated flow behaviour in soils with macropores cannot be accurat ely predicted assuming a unimodal retention characteristic. This is tr ue for both the mean drainage but even more so for the extremes. The u se of bimodal hydraulic functions considerably increased the total dra inage, resulting in an overprediction of the mean measured drainage. P redicted soil water contents in the 1 m deep soil profile are mostly h igher than the measurements. Contrary to the drainage, the range of va riation of the predicted water contents is always larger than the meas ured variability, except for the surface values.