Ka. Duggan et al., DIFFERENTIAL EFFICACY OF PERINDOPRIL AND ENALAPRIL IN EXPERIMENTAL DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY, Clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology, 23(6-7), 1996, pp. 608-610
1. Treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors ameli
orates human and experimental diabetic nephropathy, possibly as a resu
lt of changes in angiotensin II (AngII) and/or bradykinin concentratio
ns, However, ACE is an indiscriminate enzyme, which hydrolyses numerou
s vasoactive peptides at two catalytic sites that are thought to be su
bstrate specific, AngI is cleaved at the C-terminal site, bradykinin a
t both the C- and N-terminal sites, while other substrates may be pref
erentially cleaved at the N-terminal site, Of the various ACE inhibito
rs, some (e.g. perindopril) bind preferentially to the C-terminal site
while others (e.g. enalapril) bind to both, We compared the efficacy
of perindopril and enalapril in the diabetic SHR to determine whether
all the benefits of ACE inhibition derive from changes in the concentr
ations of C-terminal related substrates, 2. Diabetes was induced by ta
il vein injection of streptozotocin (60 mg/kg) in 14 week old SHR, Blo
od glucose was maintained at 4-8 mmol/L by daily ultralente insulin in
jection and rats were randomized to control, enalapril (10 mg/kg per d
ay) or perindopril (4 mg/kg per day) groups, Blood pressure, creatinin
e clearance and urinary protein excretion were monitored for 3 months,
3. Blood pressure in both treatment groups was lower than in control
(perindopril P<0.0001; enalapril P<0.0001). Levels were marginally hig
her in the perindopril group than the enalapril group, although this d
ifference was significant only in the second month (P<0.025). Creatini
ne clearance was significantly lower in the perindopril group (0.44+/-
0.05 mL/min) than in either the control rats (0.85+/-0.11 mL/min; P<0.
001) or the enalapril-treated group (0.66+/-0.05 mL/min; P<0.005). Pro
teinuria was also lower in this group (4.3+/-0.9 mg/24 h) than in the
enalapril-treated (11.3+/-5.8 mg/24 h; P<0.05) or control groups (32.1
+/-4.5 mg/24 h; P<0.0005), 4. The difference in efficacy between perin
dopril and enalapril that we have observed suggests that the benefits
of ACE inhibition derive from changes in the concentrations of peptide
s catalysed by the C-terminal rather than the N-terminal site.