Measurement of the strong gradient (with respect to the distance z fro
m the substrate surface) in the local thermal conductivity of CVD diam
ond over a wide temperature range (4-400 K) provides a powerful tool f
or identifying the microscopic sources of thermal resistance. IR absor
ption and elastic recoil measurements in the same samples reveal the p
rimary impurity to be hydrogen. However, quantitative comparison with
the measured point-defect thermal resistivity, as well as with nuclear
magnetic resonance studies, indicates that hydrogen is not by itself
a strong source of thermal resistance. Rather, it is usually associate
d with defects or other impurities which do cause thermal resistance a
nd as such the hydrogen is only a secondary indicator of thermal resis
tance. Mass-density measurements reveal a lower mass density near the
substrate surface than near the growth surface. Quantitative arguments
are given for the preferential location of point defects at grain bou
ndaries and for the preferential alignment of dislocations and twin in
tersections with the growth direction, thus accounting for the large a
nisotropy observed in the conductivity in the range z approximate to 3
0 to 100 mu m.