Background Increased familial risks in multiple sclerosis (MS) range f
rom 300-fold for monozygotic twins to 20-40-fold for biological first-
degree relatives, suggesting a genetic influence. Yet if one identical
twin has MS the other usually will not. One way of sorting out the co
ntributions of genes and environment is to study half-sibs. Methods In
a Canadian population-based sample of 16 000 is MS cases seen at 14 r
egional MS clinics one half-sib (or more) was reported by 939 index ca
ses. By interview we elicited information on family structure and an i
llness in half-sibs and any full brothers or sisters. Findings The age
-adjusted MS rate in the 1839 half-sibs of these index cases was 1.32%
compared with 3.46% far the 1395 full sibs of the same cases (p<0.001
; likelihood ratio test), There were no significant differences in ris
k for maternal versus paternal half-sibs (1.42% vs 1.19%) or for those
raised together versus those raised apart from the index case (1.17%
vs 1.47%). Interpretation Besides demonstrating the power and the feas
iblity of using half-sib studies to throw light on the aetiology of co
mplex disorders, our findings show that a shared environment does not
account for familial risk in MS and that maternal effects (such as int
rauterine and perinatal factors, breastfeeding, and genomic imprinting
) have no demonstrable effect on familial risk. Halving the number of
potentially contributory genes (by comparing full-sib and half-sib rat
es) lowers the risk of MS by a factor of 2.62, an observation consiste
nt with a polygenic hypothesis.