The social constructionist ideas currently reshaping the practice of f
amily therapy are also relevant for supervision. However, if, as postm
odernists assert, there is no privileged, expert position, hour can su
pervisors evaluate their trainees? This question-a most pertinent one
for university-based supervision, Lohere evaluation is necessary and c
onstant-is addressed both theoretically and pragmatically in this arti
cle. Ethical issues are explored, and an evaluation form, developed by
the authors for use in a family therapy doctoral program, is presente
d and discussed.