A MARKER-FREE METHOD FOR TRACKING HUMAN LOWER-LIMB SEGMENTS BASED ON MODEL-MATCHING

Authors
Citation
T. Persson, A MARKER-FREE METHOD FOR TRACKING HUMAN LOWER-LIMB SEGMENTS BASED ON MODEL-MATCHING, International journal of bio-medical computing, 41(2), 1996, pp. 87-97
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Mathematical Methods, Biology & Medicine","Engineering, Biomedical","Computer Science Interdisciplinary Applications","Computer Science Theory & Methods","Medical Informatics
ISSN journal
00207101
Volume
41
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
87 - 97
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-7101(1996)41:2<87:AMMFTH>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
A 2D marker-free method for tracking the human lower limb segments has been developed and tested, The method is based on model matching usin g distance transformations, and is intended for use in analysis of hum an gait. The model used consists of five line segments, which are matc hed to the contours of the lower limb segments. Experiments have been made on two different kinds of objects: a rigid model of a leg and a h uman leg. Only movement in the sagittal plane has been considered. An image sequence of the moving object was captured, and the method was u sed for tracking the segments of the object in each image. The results were then compared to data obtained using markers mounted at the ankl e joint, the knee joint and the hip joint. The experiments on the rigi d body were done to assess the accuracy of the method under perfect co nditions. The average difference between the estimated joint positions and the reference positions was found to be less than 2 mm for all th ree joints, with a standard deviation of less than 1 mm. To test the m ethod in a more realistic situation, it was applied to a human leg dur ing the stance phase of walking. Measurements were made on three healt hy male subjects. The average differences between the estimated joint positions and the reference marker positions were less than 6 mm, 10 m m and 22 mm, for the ankle joint, the knee joint, and the hip joint, r espectively. The corresponding standard deviations were less than 4 mm , 7 mm and 9 mm, respectively. The satisfying results, though obtained controlled laboratory conditions, show that this method might be usef ul in gait analysis.