Suppose fish are to be sampled from a stream. A fisheries biologist mi
ght ask one of the following three questions: 'How many fish do I need
to catch in order to see all of the species?', 'How many fish do I ne
ed to catch in order to see all species whose relative frequency is mo
re than 5%?', or 'How many fish do I need to catch in order to see a m
ember from each of the species A, B, and C?'. This paper offers a prac
tical solution to such questions by setting a target sample size desig
ned to achieve desired results with known probability. We present thre
e sample size methods, one we call 'exact' and the others approximate.
Each method is derived under assumed multinomial sampling, and requir
es (at least approximate) independence of draws and (usually) a large
population. The minimum information needed to compute one of the appro
ximate methods is the estimated relative frequency of the rarest speci
es of interest. Total number of species is not needed. Choice of a sam
ple size method depends largely on available computer resources. One a
pproximation (called the 'Monte Carlo approximation') gets within 16 u
nits of exact sample size, but usually requires 20-30 minutes of compu
ter time to compute. The second approximation (called the 'ratio appro
ximation') can be computed manually and has relative error under 5% wh
en all species are desired, but can be as much as 50% or more too high
when exact sample size is small. Statistically, this problem is an ap
plication of the 'sequential occupancy problem'. Three examples are gi
ven which illustrate the calculations so that a reader not interested
in technical details can apply our results.