Jm. Bellon et al., INTERFACE FORMED BETWEEN VISCERAL PERITONEUM AND EXPERIMENTAL POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE ABDOMINAL-WALL IMPLANTS, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 7(6), 1996, pp. 331-336
The objective of this work was to study the healing process at the int
erface between biomaterial and visceral peritoneum. Implants of polyte
trafluoroethylene (ePTFE) and polypropylene prostheses were introduced
into the abdominal wall of New Zea la nd rabbits. The behaviour of th
e biomaterials was analysed using light and scanning electron microsco
py and immunohistochemistry in which a specific anti-rabbit macrophage
monoclonal antibody (RAM 11) was employed. According to macroscopic o
bservation,there was significantly fewer adhesions prosthesis-viscera
to ePTFE than to polypropylene implants. After ePTFE implantation, res
toration of the peritoneum took place in an orderly fashion. When poly
propylene was used, the peritoneum formed was a disorderly tissue in w
hich small areas of haemorrhage and necrosis could be seen to coincide
with the appearance of adhesions. The number of labelled macrophages
peaked 14 days after ePTFE or polypropylene implantation, after wh ich
it decreased gradually. It is concluded that, given the low rate of a
dhesion provoked by PTFE, this material is ideal for im-plants contigu
ous to the peritoneal cavity viscera. The macrophage response does not
determine the use of one material or the other. The structure of the
newly formed peritoneum and development of adhesions depends on the po
rosity of the biomaterial.