T. Stanger et al., THE IMPACT OF A CONFUSION TECHNIQUE ON HYPNOTIC RESPONSIVITY IN LOW-SUSCEPTIBLE SUBJECTS, The American journal of clinical hypnosis, 38(3), 1996, pp. 214-218
The present study investigated the hypothesis that a confusion techniq
ue would produce greater hypnotic responsiveness for subjects who resp
onded minimally to a standard hypnotic induction. Ten subjects who sco
red in the low range of hypnotic susceptibility on the HGSHS:A (scores
of 0-4) participated in a confusion induction session. Hypnotic respo
nsiveness was measured by several scales: the Harvard Group Scale of H
ypnotic Susceptibility (HGSHS:A), a Depth Estimate (DE), and the Inven
tory Scale of Hypnotic Depth (ISHD). Qualitative data was collected vi
a a follow-up interview. Collectively, the results did not support the
hypothesis that a confusion technique is more effective than a standa
rd induction for low-susceptible subjects. Implications for future res
earch will be discussed.