R. Siedenberg et Rd. Treede, LASER-EVOKED POTENTIALS - EXOGENOUS AND ENDOGENOUS COMPONENTS, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Evoked potentials, 100(3), 1996, pp. 240-249
The aim of this study was to distinguish the exogenous component (rela
ted to the physical properties of the stimulus) and the endogenous com
ponent (reflecting event-related cognitive processing) of the laser-ev
oked potential (LEP. Short painful radiant heat pulses generated by a
CO2-laser were applied to the dorsum of the right and left foot. LEPs
were recorded with 5 scalp electrodes in the midline versus linked ear
lobes in 26 healthy subjects. In order to identify the exogenous compo
nent, the LEP was recorded during a standardised distraction task (rea
ding a short story). To identify the endogenous component P3 for the L
EP, a 2-stimulus oddball paradigm was used (20% probability of targets
). When the task of the oddball paradigm consisted of pressing a butto
n, a movement-related long-latency negativity (N1200) was recorded in
frontal leads that was absent in a counting task, The LEP of targets,
frequent non-targets and during distraction was dominated by a single
large positivity. The amplitude of this positivity was task-dependent
and increased the more attention the subject payed to the laser stimul
i (distraction < neutral < non-target < target). The laser-evoked posi
tivity during distraction had a peak latency of about 400 msec (P400)
and a maximum amplitude at the vertex, which was independent of inter-
stimulus interval. The P3 following laser stimulation had a significan
tly later peak at about 570 msec (P570) and a different scalp topograp
hy with a parietal maximum. Its amplitude decreased when the interstim
ulus interval was reduced from 10 to 6 sec. Under neutral instructions
, the LEP positivity consisted of a superposition of both the exogenou
s P400 and the endogenous P570.