COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF THE PROPHYLACTIC EFFECT OF SLOW-RELEASE DEVICES CONTAINING HOMIDIUM BROMIDE AND ISOMETAMIDIUM ON TRYPANOSOMA-CONGOLENSE IN RABBITS
P. Kageruka et al., COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF THE PROPHYLACTIC EFFECT OF SLOW-RELEASE DEVICES CONTAINING HOMIDIUM BROMIDE AND ISOMETAMIDIUM ON TRYPANOSOMA-CONGOLENSE IN RABBITS, Veterinary parasitology, 63(3-4), 1996, pp. 179-185
Two consecutive experiments were carried out to evaluate the prophylac
tic effect of biodegradable slow release devices (SRD), containing eit
her isometamidium or homidium bromide. Rabbits subcutaneously implante
d with SRD, were challenged with different Trypanosoma congolense stoc
ks at regular intervals between 1 and 6.5 months after treatment. In a
first experiment the efficacy of two types of isometamidium-SRD (poly
(D,L-lactide) and poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide)) was compared with th
e classical intramuscular (i.m.) injection of the drug. Since the form
er polymer gave an average protection period, which was much longer th
an the other isometamidium formulation, a second experiment was carrie
d out to evaluate the prophylactic effect of poly(D,L-lactide) SRD, co
ntaining either isometamidium or homidium bromide, with that of the i.
m. injections of the same drugs at a dose of 1 mg kg(-1). The average
protection period of the homidium bromide SRD was significantly longer
than that of the i.m. injected drug(112 vs. 49 days). No significant
difference was obtained, however, when isometamidium was administered
either as a SRD or as an i.m. injection. The average protection period
s were, respectively, 106 +/- 37 days and 84 +/- 18 days, When breakth
rough isolates derived from SRD-treated animals were compared with the
original stocks of T. congolense, the former showed some loss of sens
itivity to homidium bromide. No difference in sensitivity was observed
, however, for isometamidium.