Se. Brown et al., PENETRATING CHEAT TRAUMA - SHOULD INDICATIONS FOR EMERGENCY ROOM THORACOTOMY BE LIMITED, The American surgeon, 62(7), 1996, pp. 530-533
A total of 160 patients underwent emergency room thoracotomy (ERT) fro
m January 1988 to June 1995. There were 142 male and 18 female patient
s with ages ranging from 15 months to 72 years old with a mean age of
31 years. Blunt trauma was the mechanism of injury in 11 patients; non
e of them survived, and they were excluded from further analysis. A to
tal of 149 patients sustained penetrating trauma, 111 patients gunshot
wounds, and 38 patients stab wounds. A total of four patients survive
d to discharge for an overall survival rate of 2.7 per cent. All four
were victims of a stab wound and were neurologically intact at the tim
e of discharge. Special interest was placed in classifying patients ac
cording to their physiologic status both at the scene and on arrival t
o the emergency department. Class I, patients with no signs of life; C
lass II, Agonal-patients in electromechanical dissociation/pulseless e
lectrical activity with no palpable pulse or blood pressure; Class III
, Profound Shock-patients with blood pressure less than 60 mm Hg, and
Class IV, Mild Shock-patients with blood pressure between 60 and 90 mm
Hg. 122 patients (89%) fitted the criteria for Scene Classes I and II
. None of these patients improved or responded to prehospital resuscit
ation to be moved up to Emergency Department Classes III or IV, and al
l of them died. Of the four survivors, three were in Scene Class III a
nd one was in Scene Class IV. This study confirms a previous report th
at, overall, ERT has a very low survival rate. ERT should be abandoned
in patients sustaining: blunt trauma, and should probably be limited
to patients sustaining penetrating chest injuries who fall into the ph
ysiologic Classes III or IV at the scene.