COMPARISON BETWEEN THE 2-PHASE AND 3-PHASE MODELS FOR ANALYSIS OF POROSITY FORMATION IN ALUMINUM-RICH CASTINGS

Citation
Av. Kuznetsov et K. Vafai, COMPARISON BETWEEN THE 2-PHASE AND 3-PHASE MODELS FOR ANALYSIS OF POROSITY FORMATION IN ALUMINUM-RICH CASTINGS, Numerical heat transfer. Part A, Applications, 29(8), 1996, pp. 859-867
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Mechanics,Thermodynamics
ISSN journal
10407782
Volume
29
Issue
8
Year of publication
1996
Pages
859 - 867
Database
ISI
SICI code
1040-7782(1996)29:8<859:CBT2A3>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
This article presents comparisons between an analytical and a numerica l investigation of porosity formation within the mushy zone during the solidification process. For this purpose, a three-phase model (liquid , solid, and gas) of the mushy zone is utilized. This model takes into account the release of the dissolved gas from the alloy as well as th e heat transfer and interdendritic fluid flow in the two-phase region. The main difference between the three-phase model and the two-phase m odel (only liquid and solid), which is usually used to predict the por osity distribution, is the inclusion of a term describing the porosity formation in the continuity equation. The perturbation method irs use d to obtain an analytical solution describing the porosity formation. Pressure and porosity distributions predicted by these two models are compared for the particular case of aluminum-rich AI-Cu castings.