This article examines insurers' choice between independent and exclusi
ve agents. We assume that alternative distribution systems are efficie
nt mechanisms for controlling contracting problems among policyholders
, insurers, and agents. Because the use of independent agents helps co
ntrol potential expropriative behavior by the insurer, the independent
agency system should be more valuable for ownership structures where
such problems are more severe. Thus, ownership structures and distribu
tion systems are strategic complements. We test this theory by analyzi
ng the association between distribution-system choice and the firm's o
wnership structure, lines of insurance, advertising policy, size, geog
raphic concentration, and cost structure among property-liability insu
rers.