REFRACTORY DUODENAL-ULCER HEALING AND RELAPSE - COMPARISON OF OMEPRAZOLE WITH HELICOBACTER-PYLORI ERADICATION

Citation
E. Avsar et al., REFRACTORY DUODENAL-ULCER HEALING AND RELAPSE - COMPARISON OF OMEPRAZOLE WITH HELICOBACTER-PYLORI ERADICATION, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 8(5), 1996, pp. 449-452
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
ISSN journal
0954691X
Volume
8
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
449 - 452
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-691X(1996)8:5<449:RDHAR->2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Objective: To investigate differences between omeprazole and Helicobac ter pylori eradication in patients with duodenal ulcers refractory to H-2-receptor antagonists and to compare the recurrence rates after the two treatments. Design and methods: Forty-five patients with endoscop ically proven duodenal ulcers refractory to H-2-receptor antagonists a nd H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of treatment with omeprazole 40 mg/day or 4 weeks of treatment with colloidal bismu th subcitrate 480 mg/day plus metronidazole 750 mg/day and tetracyclin e 1000 mg/day from day 1 to day 14. Patients were evaluated endoscopic ally and clinically at the end of treatment. Patients with healed ulce rs were followed up for 1 year after cessation of the treatment. Endos copy was performed at 3 and 12 months. Results: Ulcer healing occurred in 100% (21/21) of patients on triple therapy and 70.5% (12/17) of th ose treated with omeprazole alone (P=0.0123). The relapse rate at the 3rd month was 11.7% (2/17) in the triple therapy group and 60% (6/10) in the omeprazole group (P = 0.0248). Of the patients followed to stud y endpoint (relapse or endoscopy at 12 months) three of 12 (25%) recei ving triple therapy, compared to six of eight (75%) receiving omeprazo le, relapsed (P = 0.0648). Conclusion: These results show that triple therapy is more effective than omeprazole in the treatment of refracto ry duodenal ulcers and reduces the rate of ulcer relapse.