GROWTH-FACTORS AND INTRAUTERINE GROWTH-RETARDATION .1. SERUM GROWTH-HORMONE, INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH-FACTOR (IGF)-I, IGF-II, AND IGF BINDING-PROTEIN 3 LEVELS IN NORMALLY GROWN AND GROWTH-RETARDED HUMAN FETUSES DURING THE 2ND HALF OF GESTATION
J. Leger et al., GROWTH-FACTORS AND INTRAUTERINE GROWTH-RETARDATION .1. SERUM GROWTH-HORMONE, INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH-FACTOR (IGF)-I, IGF-II, AND IGF BINDING-PROTEIN 3 LEVELS IN NORMALLY GROWN AND GROWTH-RETARDED HUMAN FETUSES DURING THE 2ND HALF OF GESTATION, Pediatric research, 40(1), 1996, pp. 94-100
The aim of this study was to relate human fetal growth retardation to
specific hormone alterations. Serum levels of GH, IGF-I, IGF-II, and I
GF binding protein (BP) 3 were measured during the second half of gest
ation after cordocentesis in 230 fetuses who were classified into norm
ally grown (n = 166) and growth-retarded (it = 64) groups according to
ante- and neonatal measurements. The normally grown group showed a pr
ogressive decline in serum GH levels toward term (r = -0.42, p = 0.000
1), whereas serum IGF-I was increased (r = 0.55, p = 0.0001), as were
serum IGF-II (r = 0.21, p = 0.008) and IGFBP3 levels (r = 0.19, p = 0.
02), although less markedly. For all hormone levels, wide individual d
ifferences were found at any given age of gestation. The incidental pr
esence of fetal malformations in either the normally grown group (n =
101 cases) or the growth-retarded group (it = 50 cases) had no apparen
t effect on these hormone levels as compared with members of the group
s showing no fetal malformations (it = 73 cases). Comparison of the no
rmally grown group with the growth-retarded group showed that serum GF
-I levels were significantly lower in the growth-retarded group (p = 0
.001). No differences were found between the groups in serum GH, IGF-I
I, and IGFBP3 levels, although if data for the third trimester were ta
ken alone, serum IGF-II levels were found to be lower in the growth-re
tarded group (p = 0.05). In conclusion, during the second half of gest
ation, fetal serum IGF-I levels may be influenced by nutritional facto
rs controlling fetal growth. However, the wide individual differences
in measurements make it a very poor biologic marker of intrauterine gr
owth retardation.