Should business leaders whose religious convictions lead them to a man
agement philosophy that explicitly integrates ethics into business pra
ctices censor their religious motivations? While business ethics has n
ot taken the harsh exclusionary position that has been taken in a good
deal of academic writing about religion's role in politics, there is
a sense that religiously motivated executives ought not identify those
motivations as reasons for their ethical practices. A 1994 book by bu
siness ethicist Laura Nash demonstrates that this issue is a dilemma f
or many leaders in business, and a 1995 book by legal philosopher Kent
Greenawalt refines the debate over religion's role in politics. Using
these books as a starting point for analysis, business leaders ought
not restrict referencing their religious beliefs when making corporate
decisions. Neither epistemological nor consequentialist arguments exc
luding religion are sound. Instead, one ought to adopt an inclusionist
approach in which leaders are free to identify the reasons for their
ethical (or other) business practices.