Hs. Crombag et al., SIGNALED VERSUS UNSIGNALED INTRAVENOUS AMPHETAMINE - LARGE DIFFERENCES IN THE ACUTE PSYCHOMOTOR RESPONSE AND SENSITIZATION, Brain research, 722(1-2), 1996, pp. 227-231
Both the acute psychomotor response and the development of sensitizati
on to amphetamine are attenuated if i.p. injections are given in the c
age where animals live (HOME), relative to when injections are given i
n a novel (NOVEL), but otherwise physically identical cage. It was sug
gested that this effect of environment on sensitization may be due to
the relative availability of cues predictive of drug administration in
the two conditions. It was hypothesized, therefore, that removal of a
ll environmental cues predictive of drug administration would attenuat
e the development of sensitization even further. This was accomplished
by comparing the psychomotor activating effects (rotational behavior)
of repeated unsignalled intravenous (i.v.) infusions of 1.0 mg/kg amp
hetamine given in a HOME environment with those of signalled i.v. infu
sions given in a NOVEL environment. It was found that signalled i.v. a
mphetamine administration (NOVEL) produced a large acute psychomotor r
esponse, and repeated administrations resulted in a significant increa
se in psychomotor response (i.e., sensitization). In contrast, the sam
e treatment in the HOME condition produced only a very small acute res
ponse and no sensitization. Indeed, the magnitude of the psychomotor r
esponse to an amphetamine challenge varied approximately 23-fold as a
function of past drug history and environmental condition. It is sugge
sted that this paradigm provides a powerful new model to study how env
ironmental factors modulate responsiveness to psychoactive drugs.