FAT-SUPPRESSED 3-DIMENSIONAL SPOILED GRADIENT-ECHO MR-IMAGING OF HYALINE CARTILAGE DEFECTS IN THE KNEE - COMPARISON WITH STANDARD MR-IMAGING AND ARTHROSCOPY
Dg. Disler et al., FAT-SUPPRESSED 3-DIMENSIONAL SPOILED GRADIENT-ECHO MR-IMAGING OF HYALINE CARTILAGE DEFECTS IN THE KNEE - COMPARISON WITH STANDARD MR-IMAGING AND ARTHROSCOPY, American journal of roentgenology, 167(1), 1996, pp. 127-132
OBJECTIVE. The sensitivity of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled
gradient-echo (SPGR) images was compared with that of standard MR ima
ges for detecting hyaline cartilage defects of the knee, using arthros
copy as the standard of reference. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We assessed 1
14 consecutive patients for hyaline cartilage defects of the knee with
both standard MR imaging sequences and a sagittal fat suppressed thre
e-dimensional SPGR sequence. Of these patients, 48 with meniscal or li
gament injury, or persistent symptoms, underwent subsequent arthroscop
y. The standard MR images and SPGR images of these 48 patients were th
en retrospectively analyzed for articular defects in a blinded fashion
by two independent observers, Sensitivity, specificity, and intraobse
rver and interobserver agreement were determined for the different ima
ging techniques. RESULTS. One fourth of the patients who went on to ar
throscopy were shown to have isolated hyaline cartilage lesions that w
ere clinically confused with meniscal tears and that were missed on th
e standard MR images. When looking at all surfaces combined for each r
eader, the SPGR imaging sequence had a significantly higher sensitivit
y than the standard MR imaging sequences for detecting hyaline cartila
ge defects (75-85% versus 29-38%, p <.001 for each comparison). When l
ooking at individual surfaces for each reader, significant differences
in sensitivity were shown for each surface except the trochlear and l
ateral tibial surfaces. We found no difference in specificity (97% ver
sus 97%, p >.99). We also found that combined evaluation of standard M
R and SPGR images gave no added diagnostic advantage (sensitivity, 86%
; specificity, 97%; p >.42). Except for the lateral tibial surface, th
e study achieved excellent reproducibility among readings and between
readers. CONCLUSION. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging is
more sensitive than standard MR imaging for the detection of hyaline c
artilage defects of the knee.