EVALUATION OF SOFT-TISSUE FOREIGN-BODIES - COMPARING CONVENTIONAL PLAIN FILM RADIOGRAPHY, COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY PRINTED ON FILM, AND COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY DISPLAYED ON A COMPUTER WORKSTATION
B. Reiner et al., EVALUATION OF SOFT-TISSUE FOREIGN-BODIES - COMPARING CONVENTIONAL PLAIN FILM RADIOGRAPHY, COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY PRINTED ON FILM, AND COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY DISPLAYED ON A COMPUTER WORKSTATION, American journal of roentgenology, 167(1), 1996, pp. 141-144
OBJECTIVE. The study was performed to evaluate detection of soft-tissu
e foreign bodies using conventional radiography (film-screen radiograp
hy), computed radiography printed on films (computed radiography-hard
copy), and computed radiography displayed on a computer workstation (c
omputed radiography-soft copy). SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifteen foreign
bodies of different size, shape, and composition were implanted at dif
ferent locations in a fresh cadaveric hand, and images were obtained u
sing three radiographic techniques. Images were evaluated by four boar
d-certified radiologists to ascertain the conspicuity of the foreign b
odies with the different techniques. A subjective grade was assigned t
o each image in an attempt to identify the relative conspicuity of for
eign bodies when imaged with the three techniques. RESULTS. Computed r
adiography-soft copy is the preferred imaging technique for the detect
ion of wood and plastic foreign bodies in soft tissue regardless of th
e size of the wood or the plastic, No significant differences in consp
icuity among the three techniques were demonstrated with glass foreign
bodies. CONCLUSION. Detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies is best d
one using computed radiography-soft copy instead of film-screen radiog
raphy and computed radiography-hard copy imaging.