Laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic interventions such as nephrectomy
or tumour nephrectomy call for the removal of large quantities of tis
sue which can no longer be extracted via the relatively confined lumen
of a cannula. For this purpose, a variety of organ retrieval systems
have been designed and are commercially available with the aim of safe
tissue retrieval, This paper summarizes the results of an experimenta
l and clinical comparison of the most important organ entrapment syste
ms suitable for endoscopic nephrectomy. The LapSac(R) was the first or
gan bag especially designed for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Despite vari
ous new modifications of this entrapment system, it still represents o
ne of the best alternatives and has been used worldwide with success.
However, due to its simplicity it requires laparoscopic expertise. New
ly developed retrieval systems (i.e. LapBag(R), Extraction Bag(R)) off
er some advantages regarding the handling of the bag which may be part
icularly useful during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy with a restric
ted working space. Retrieval systems (i.e. Endobag(R), Endopouch(R)) w
ith low resistance to tear forces or being permeable for tumour cells
or bacteria (i.e. Espiner Bag(R)) cannot be recommended for endoscopic
nephrectomy.