H. Fritz et M. Degarinewichatitsky, FORAGING IN A SOCIAL ANTELOPE - EFFECTS OF GROUP-SIZE ON FORAGING CHOICES AND RESOURCE PERCEPTION IN IMPALA, Journal of Animal Ecology, 65(6), 1996, pp. 736-742
1. Many studies of foraging in social species have identified benefits
for individuals from foraging in groups, but few have demonstrated th
at there are also costs. We wanted to evaluate the effects of the grou
p on individual foraging behaviour in a social antelope, and the way i
t affects resource perception by the forager when foraging in differen
t group sizes. 2. We monitored the foraging behaviour of impala (Aepyc
eros melampus Lichtenstein) in Acacia scrubland in highveld Zimbabwe.
We investigated the influence of group size on the foraging decisions
of focal individuals, and the process by which impala select bushes to
feed on, and how many bites to take. 3. We demonstrated that group si
ze had a major influence in the foraging decisions made by the impala,
as it determined the number of bites taken from a selected bush by an
individual. The cost of foraging in groups was higher when feeding on
small bushes, i.e. the potential number of bites to be taken by an in
dividual from low biomass bushes decreased faster with increasing grou
p size than for high biomass bushes. 4. Impala appeared to be frequenc
y-independent 'predators' with strong preferences for high profitabili
ty 'prey' types and seem to select bushes ('prey') on a potential gain
basis (i.e. potential number of bites to be gained), and not on a str
ict biomass basis. This result implies that they were taking the group
size into account when choosing the bushes. 5. We suggest that impala
scanned the Acacia field at the bite level, the field being a mosaic
of patches of different bite densities, and that the perception of the
resource by individuals in a groups is strongly affected by the numbe
r of individuals foraging together.