FORAGING IN A SOCIAL ANTELOPE - EFFECTS OF GROUP-SIZE ON FORAGING CHOICES AND RESOURCE PERCEPTION IN IMPALA

Citation
H. Fritz et M. Degarinewichatitsky, FORAGING IN A SOCIAL ANTELOPE - EFFECTS OF GROUP-SIZE ON FORAGING CHOICES AND RESOURCE PERCEPTION IN IMPALA, Journal of Animal Ecology, 65(6), 1996, pp. 736-742
Citations number
51
Categorie Soggetti
Ecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00218790
Volume
65
Issue
6
Year of publication
1996
Pages
736 - 742
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8790(1996)65:6<736:FIASA->2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
1. Many studies of foraging in social species have identified benefits for individuals from foraging in groups, but few have demonstrated th at there are also costs. We wanted to evaluate the effects of the grou p on individual foraging behaviour in a social antelope, and the way i t affects resource perception by the forager when foraging in differen t group sizes. 2. We monitored the foraging behaviour of impala (Aepyc eros melampus Lichtenstein) in Acacia scrubland in highveld Zimbabwe. We investigated the influence of group size on the foraging decisions of focal individuals, and the process by which impala select bushes to feed on, and how many bites to take. 3. We demonstrated that group si ze had a major influence in the foraging decisions made by the impala, as it determined the number of bites taken from a selected bush by an individual. The cost of foraging in groups was higher when feeding on small bushes, i.e. the potential number of bites to be taken by an in dividual from low biomass bushes decreased faster with increasing grou p size than for high biomass bushes. 4. Impala appeared to be frequenc y-independent 'predators' with strong preferences for high profitabili ty 'prey' types and seem to select bushes ('prey') on a potential gain basis (i.e. potential number of bites to be gained), and not on a str ict biomass basis. This result implies that they were taking the group size into account when choosing the bushes. 5. We suggest that impala scanned the Acacia field at the bite level, the field being a mosaic of patches of different bite densities, and that the perception of the resource by individuals in a groups is strongly affected by the numbe r of individuals foraging together.