K. Kivi et al., AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY ON THE ROLE OF CRUSTACEAN AND MICROPROTOZOAN GRAZERS IN THE PLANKTONIC FOOD-WEB, Marine ecology. Progress series, 136(1-3), 1996, pp. 59-68
The roles of inorganic nutrients and grazing by crustaceans and microp
rotozoans as factors shaping the planktonic community of the Gulf of F
inland were studied in a 6 d laboratory experiment. The removal of met
azoans >100 mu m greatly enhanced microprotozoan growth during the las
t 3 d of the experiment. When inorganic N and P additions were combine
d with the removal of metazoans, the growth of protozoans was stimulat
ed even further. On the other hand, addition of metazoans >200 mu m ke
pt the protozoan populations low, even in the presence of extra N and
P. In connection with high protozoan numbers, the growth of phytoplank
ton >10 mu m was enhanced, while the 1-10 mu m phytoplankton populatio
ns decreased towards the end of the experiment. With abundant metazoo-
plankton and nutrient additions (and only few protozoans), phytoplankt
on in the size range of 1 to 10 mu m flourished, while >10 mu m phytop
lankton biomass did not rise above the initial level. Whether the graz
er community was dominated by protozoans or metazoans did not have muc
h effect on picoalgal (<2 mu m) growth, but the presence of crustacean
s resulted in increased bacterial production in nonnutrient-enriched c
onditions. The results suggest that total phytoplankton biomass is lar
gely determined by both nutrient availability and grazer activities, a
nd can be quite similar in both proto- and metazoan-dominated communit
ies. However, the structure of the prey communities >2 mu m depends on
the composition of the grazer populations. The biomass and compositio
n of microprotozoan communities also appear largely to depend on the s
haping effect of metazoan grazers. Nutrient recycling by crustaceans s
eems to enhance bacterial production, and possibly also picoalgal grow
th.