EVALUATING ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE USE AT 6 AND 12 MONTHS

Citation
Oo. Adesanya et Cf. Colie, EVALUATING ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE USE AT 6 AND 12 MONTHS, Journal of reproductive medicine, 41(6), 1996, pp. 431-434
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
ISSN journal
00247758
Volume
41
Issue
6
Year of publication
1996
Pages
431 - 434
Database
ISI
SICI code
0024-7758(1996)41:6<431:EOUA6A>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if oval contraceptive use necessitates more th an a yearly visit. STUDY DESIGN: Outpatient files of all patients in a gynecologic clinic were evaluated. Patients who were started on oral contraceptives were identified. The findings on their return visits at 6 months and 12, months were compared for any significant differences . RESULTS: There was no increased incidence of elevation in blood pres sure noted at the 6-month visit when compared to the 12-month visit. L ikewise, there was no significant difference in the incidence of abnor mal findings on breast and pelvic examinations at the 6-month visit as compared to the 12-month visit. CONCLUSION: Annual evaluations for pa tients on low-dose oval contraceptives are adequate. The patients who attended this clinic were working-class, middle-aged women, and as suc h the data from this study may not be applicable to the population at large.