The transformation of a non-market to a market economy ought to change
fundamentally the significance of money incomes for welfare. Whereas
in a stressful non-market economy such as the former Soviet Union, non
-monetized resources could substitute for money income and promote wel
fare, in a modern market economy money income should be a good proxy f
or household welfare. This article tests the extent to which Russians
are now in a modern market economy by analyzing data from nationwide R
ussian surveys in January, 1992, and April, 1994. Modern influences ar
e increasingly important as a determinant of the distribution of money
incomes, but not as an influence upon household welfare. The ''random
ness'' of temporary disruptions of welfare is in accord with Rawlsian
principles of equity.