Hn. Garb et Cj. Schramke, JUDGMENT RESEARCH AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT - A NARRATIVE REVIEW AND METAANALYSES, Psychological bulletin, 120(1), 1996, pp. 140-153
The authors review judgment research in the area of neuropsychological
assessment. Topics include the reliability and validity of judgments,
the appropriateness of confidence ratings, the value of training and
experience, the cognitive processes of neuropsychologists, and the use
of decision aids, including automated assessment programs and statist
ical prediction rules. Most of the research is on reliability and vali
dity. The results indicate that neuropsychologists frequently make rel
iable and moderately valid judgments. However, for several tasks, expe
rimenters have not studied the reliability and validity of judgments.