Yp. Shao et A. Hendersonsellers, VALIDATION OF SOIL-MOISTURE SIMULATION IN LANDSURFACE PARAMETERIZATION SCHEMES WITH HAPEX DATA, Global and planetary change, 13(1-4), 1996, pp. 11-46
In the Soil Moisture Simulation Workshop, a number of numerical experi
ments was conducted with fourteen representative schemes and the resul
ts compared with HAPEX-MOBILHY data. This paper documents the general
outcomes of the workshop, and provides the background information for
the other papers presented in this special issue, which deal with more
specific aspects of soil moisture simulation and the performance of i
ndividual schemes. The results show that soil moisture simulation in c
urrent landsurface schemes is profoundly different. After adjustment o
f landsurface parameters, the disagreement in soil moisture for a 1.6
m soil layer remains around 100 mm. Correspondingly, the differences i
n predicted annual cumulative evaporation as well as total runoff plus
drainage are around 250 mm (annual precipitation being 856 mm for HAP
EX-MOBILHY). The partitioning of surface available energy into sensibl
e and latent heat fluxes is closely coupled to that of precipitation i
nto evaporation and runoff plus drainage. ?These disagreements are rel
ated to different causes but attempts to establish the causality betwe
en the outcome and the responsible mechanism has had only limited succ
ess to date because of the non-linear interactions embedded in the sch
emes. This study implies that different schemes achieve different equi
librium states when forced with prescribed atmospheric conditions and
that the time period to reach these states differs among schemes; and
even when soil moisture is fairly well simulated, the processes (parti
cularly evaporation and runoff plus drainage) controlling the simulati
on differ among schemes and at different times of the year. These resu
lts suggest that prescription of landsurface scheme physics and bioche
mistry may have to be a function of the type of predictions (short-ter
m weather forecasting, mesoscale modelling or climate ensembles) requi
red as well as the underlying scheme formulation and that scheme simul
ations should be validated for all components of the prediction.