The usual methodology employed in analysis after a sequential clinical
trial is based on orderings of the possible samples resulting from th
e design. However, this approach lacks flexibility for use in wider ap
plications. In this paper two estimation techniques not based on order
ings are considered and modified to obtain improved accuracy. A bias-a
djusted maximum likelihood estimate together with a new and general me
thod for setting confidence limits are discussed. The realistic scenar
io of group sequential monitoring is assumed and methods for exact est
imation are given. Accuracy of the methodology after a triangular test
and an O'Brien & Fleming test are demonstrated through simulation.