Methods of combination are used to synthesize pieces of evidence of eq
ual standing that represent different aspects of a specific system abo
ut which a diagnosis is to be made. Combination is distinct from conse
nsus, when complete diagnoses rendered by different knowledge sources
require synthesis, and conditionalization, where pieces of evidence to
be synthesized have dissymmetric relationships to each other. The Dem
pster-Shafer Rule is the quintessential combination method. However, i
t has been criticized for its inability to handle inconsistent pieces
of evidence and for the way it focuses the weight of evidence. This ar
ticle presents an alternative combination method that is capable of ha
ndling inconsistent evidence and relates evidence focusing to the amou
nt of information resident in pieces of evidence. The method is capabl
e of combining belief functions. Future research should address extend
ing the method to the combination of a broad class of imprecise probab
ility functions. (C) 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.