W. Hubl et al., USE OF PRECISION PROFILES TO EVALUATE PRECISION OF THE AUTOMATED LEUKOCYTE DIFFERENTIAL, Clinical chemistry, 42(7), 1996, pp. 1068-1073
The commonly used methods of assessing the precision of the automated
leukocyte differential have certain drawbacks that affect the validity
and comparability of results. In the present report, we introduce a p
rocedure based on building precision profiles from a large number of w
ithin-run imprecision experiments. The profiles are fitted to the func
tion for the CV of proportions, which yields the number of theoretical
ly differentiated leukocytes. Differences between fitted curves are ev
aluated for statistical significance by the F-test. As an example, we
compared the precision of two hematology analyzers, a flow-cytometric
technique involving fluorescence-labeled monoclonal antibodies, and th
e manual differential. We were able to establish definite differences
in precision between different analyzers and different leukocyte class
es. Our data also indicated that conventional within-run imprecision s
tudies may completely misjudge analyzer precision. Furthermore, we cou
ld demonstrate that the precision of analyzers that analyze a fixed am
ount of blood rather than a fixed number of leukocytes is strongly inf
luenced by the leukocyte count of the sample, leading to high imprecis
ion for leukopenic samples. We believe the proposed procedure is a use
ful addition to currently used protocols; it yields clear results and
creates a statistical basis of comparison between various instruments
and techniques of differentiation.