Repairs to legal drains in the United States may be regulated to prote
ct adjacent wetlands under Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, commonly known as the Clean Water Act (CWA). However, few
studies have examined effects of legal drain clean-outs on adjacent w
etlands and associated migratory waterbird populations. I compare wate
r regimes, cover-to-open water ratios, and waterbird use on Bruns, Big
, Meszaros, and Kraft sloughs (BBMK) in Sargent County, North Dakota b
efore and after the clean-out of Crete-Cogswell Drain No. 11, and rela
te wetland habitat loss to observed disease-related mortality among st
aging waterfowl in fall 1990 and spring 1991. Water regimes of BBMK we
re exceptionally stable, with few records of drawdowns before 1984 whe
n the clean-out began. After the clean-out (1987-90), BBM were dry by
mid-summer in all years and open area declined by 96% by 1990, whereas
Kraft Slough (a control area) had water throughout all years and perc
ent open area did not change. Numerous species of waterbirds nested in
BBMK before the clean-out, and mean ranks of waterbird density were s
imilar. After the clean-out, waterbirds failed to breed successfully i
n all years at BBM, and use as major waterfowl staging areas and for w
aterfowl hunting also ended. At Kraft Slough, use by breeding and stag
ing waterbirds continued in all years, as did waterfowl hunting. Reduc
ed access to fresh water after the Drain No. 11 clean-out may have con
tributed to a dieoff of 487 lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens) from
necrotic enteritis in Kraft Slough in November 1990. Loss of three ma
jor staging areas in Sargent County as a result of the drain clean-out
has further concentrated migrant waterfowl, particularly during droug
ht periods, increasing the magnitude of risk when epizootics occur in
southeastern North Dakota. Ducks and geese banded in Sargent County ha
ve been recovered from 34 and 14 states, 7 and 6 provinces of Canada,
and 13 and 1 other countries, respectively, indicating waterfowl popul
ations from a wide area are potentially vulnerable to epizootics when
crowded into limited roosting habitat. Despite causing the loss of wet
land habitat for thousands of midcontinent waterfowl and other waterbi
rds, a Federal Court in North Dakota ruled that the clean-out of Drain
No. 11 met the criteria necessary to be considered maintenance under
Section 404 clause (f)(1)(c) and was not recaptured under clause (f)(2
). This outcome suggests current law does not protect wetland function
s needed to support migratory waterbird populations or associated recr
eational values when sites have become naturally restored through lack
of maintenance of legal drains.