P. Kulkarni et Ka. Brown, VENTILATORY PARAMETERS IN CHILDREN DURING PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA - A COMPARISON WITH HALOTHANE, Canadian journal of anaesthesia, 43(7), 1996, pp. 653-659
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of propo
fol on ventilation with those of halothane. Methods: Respiration was s
tudied in 20 spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective dent
al restoration randomized to receive either propofol (Group P) or halo
thane (Group H) anaesthesia; Data were recorded at different inspired
concentrations of halothane (FIH) or propofol (RivP) during a washout
of the anaesthetic agent. The FIH 2%, 1% and 0% corresponded to an end
-tidal halothane concentration of 1.38 +/- 0.06%, 0.857 +/- 0.03% and
0.191 +/- 0.01% respectively. The RivP were 18, 15, 12, 9 and 0 mg . k
g(-1). hr(-1). The inspiratory flow waveform, the CO2 waveform and the
occluded inspiratory pressure waveform were recorded. The flow wavefo
rm was analyzed for minute ventilation (Pi), and tidal volume (VT), pa
rameters of breath Timing [Total time (Ttot), Inspiratory time (Ti)]an
d parameters of breath Amplitude [mean inspiratory flow (VT/Ti)]. The
slope of the initial 100 msec (dP/dt(0.1)) of an occluded inspiration,
together with the occluded inspiratory time (Ti-occ) and the ratio of
the occluded to unoccluded inspiratory time (T-iocc/Ti) were obtained
Results: There were intergroup differences in the preemergence values
of Ttot, dP/dt(0.1) and Ti-occ/Ti. In group P the Vi, VT and Ttot inc
reased and PETCO(2) decreased during a washout of propofol. The values
of dP/dt(0.1), in Group P at all RivP were half the values of those i
n Group H. The ratio Ti-occ/Ti did not change in Group P and increased
in Group H during a washout of halothane. Conclusion: Propofol anaest
hesia was associated with a decrease in Pi whereas during halothane an
aesthesia, Pi did not change. Ventilation in Group P differed from Gro
up H in parameters of both breath Drive and Timing.