During the last two decades optimization models have often been used b
y archaeologists to explain animal exploitation. The employment of the
se models has had both successes and failures. One failure is that opt
imization models consider animal resource selection solely from an eco
nomic point of view. Two alternative ways of exploring animal exploita
tion are offered here: 1) ethnohistoric analogy and 2) a structural ap
proach. Ethnohistoric analogy and direct historical approaches can yie
ld new insights into the symbolic roles animals might have played in t
he past but are limited in their applicability to prehistoric archaeol
ogy. A structural approach can simultaneously examine both the symboli
c and economic roles of animals and has the additional advantage that
it is equally applicable in both prehistoric and historic archaeology.
The utility of these alternative approaches is explored using zooarch
aeological and artistic data from the Midwestern United States, c.AD 8
00-1400.