AB-INITIO CALCULATIONS OF THE TRANSITION-STATE ENERGY AND POSITION FOR THE REACTION H-]HH+C(2)H(4)R, WITH R=H, CH3, NH2, CN, CF3, C5H6 - COMPARISON TO MARCUS THEORY, MILLERS THEORY, AND BOCKRIS MODEL(C(2)H(5)R)
Wt. Lee et Ri. Masel, AB-INITIO CALCULATIONS OF THE TRANSITION-STATE ENERGY AND POSITION FOR THE REACTION H-]HH+C(2)H(4)R, WITH R=H, CH3, NH2, CN, CF3, C5H6 - COMPARISON TO MARCUS THEORY, MILLERS THEORY, AND BOCKRIS MODEL(C(2)H(5)R), Journal of physical chemistry, 100(26), 1996, pp. 10945-10951
Some years ago, Murdoch proposed that one can use the Marcus equation
to predict the position of the transition state for chemical reactions
. A slightly different equation was proposed by Miller. In this paper,
ab initio calculations are used to test Murdoch's and Miller's propos
al for a series of hydrogen abstraction reactions: H + CH(3)CH(2)R -->
H-2 + CH(2)CH(2)R, with R = H, CH3, CN, CF3, C5H5. We find that in al
l cases the reactions have late or very late transition states. If we
define chi as a dimensionless reaction coordinate which goes from 0 at
the reactants to 1 at the products, we find that the chi of the trans
ition state varies from 0.63 to 0.86, for the cases here. In contrast,
the Marcus equation and Miller's equation give quantitatively incorre
ct results, i.e., early to middle transition states (chi = 0.44-0.51).
There does not appear to be any correlation between the positions of
the transition state estimated from the ab initio calculations and tho
se predicted by the Marcus equation or Miller's equation. Interestingl
y, the Hammond hypothesis gives a reasonable fit to the data. The ener
gy of the transition state is reasonably well predicted by the Marcus
equation, however. Detailed analysis of our results indicates that Pau
li repulsions (i.e. electron-electron repulsions) play a key role in d
etermining the position of the transition state. The Pauli repulsions
are ignored in Marcus' model.